{01} EMPLOYMENT LAW AI CHATBOTS

Halfyourwebvisitorsareventing.Achatbotcantellwhichhalfbeforeyourteamdoes.

Employment websites attract a flood of angry visitors, and most do not have a viable claim. An AI chatbot built for employment engages each one, asks the qualifying questions you would ask, what happened, when, is there documentation, and separates the strong wrongful termination or harassment claim from the venting, before a human spends a minute. The wronged employee with a real case gets booked. The rest get a courteous answer.

  • Trained on your firm and your claim criteria
  • Pre-screens strong claims from venting
  • Books real consultations, not just emails

Free chat intake review. See what your site is losing. Yours to keep.

See what your website is losing

We review your site's intake, show where wronged employees drop off, and set up a chatbot that pre-screens claims, trained on your firm and your criteria.

No contract. No spam. One firm per market.

{02} THE UNFILTERED FLOOD

Every angry visitor reaches your team, viable or not.

  • The venting that reaches your team anyway. Most employment website visitors are upset but do not have a viable claim. With only a contact form, every one of them lands in your inbox the same way the strong cases do, and your team spends its hours sorting instead of signing. The site captures everyone and qualifies no one.

  • The strong case buried in the noise. The rare, valuable claim is sitting in the same pile as the venting, and if it waits while your team digs through, the angry-but-righteous client calls a competitor. Without pre-screening, your best cases are indistinguishable from your worst until someone spends time on them.

  • The form that asks nothing useful. A generic name-and-message form tells you nothing about whether a case is viable. The visitor types I was treated unfairly and you still have to chase every fact by hand. A form that does not ask the qualifying questions just moves the sorting problem to your desk.

  • Mostemployment website visitors do not have a viable claim
  • Buriedthe strong case sits in the same pile as the venting
  • They typethe whole story, if the chat asks the right questions

{03} IMAGINE INSTEAD

A website that sorts the strong claim from the venting before your team wakes up.

Picture 11pm. Someone just fired is on your site, angry, ready to tell their story. The chat opens and asks what happened, when, and whether there is documentation, the same questions you would. The strong wrongful termination claim is qualified and booked for the morning, its facts already captured. The visitor who is upset but has no viable claim gets a courteous, helpful reply, not an attorney hour. Your team wakes up to a short list of real cases. Your website did the first round of qualifying while you slept.

Pre-screens the flood

Asks your qualifying questions and sorts strong claims from venting, before a human spends a minute.

Books the real cases

Qualifies and books the viable claim while the resolve is fresh, hands callers to your voice agent.

Handles the rest with care

Gives the non-viable visitor a courteous answer that protects your reviews, without burning an attorney hour.

{04} WHAT WE BUILD

Not a FAQ widget. A trained pre-screener for your intake.

01

Trained on your firm and your claim criteria

Your claim types, your qualifying questions, your process, your attorneys. It screens like a member of your intake team, because functionally it is.

02

Claim-screening qualification

It asks what happened, when, and whether there is documentation, and separates viable wrongful termination, harassment, discrimination, retaliation, and wage claims from the venting.

03

Empowering, careful guidance

It helps a wronged visitor understand their rights in general terms, without giving legal advice or promising an outcome, then moves a viable claim toward a consultation.

04

Direct consultation booking

Qualified visitors book inside the chat, with confirmations and reminders through your automations.

05

Courteous handling of non-cases

Visitors without a viable claim get a respectful, helpful response that protects your reputation and reviews, without taking an attorney's time.

06

Every chat logged to your CRM

Transcripts, qualifying facts, and bookings to your system, tied to the ads or rankings that brought them in.

{05} PROOF

The demo is already on this page.

The chat assistant in the corner of this site is the product. Ask it how it would screen a wrongful termination claim. Ask it whether AI chat is allowed under bar rules. Then imagine it trained on your firm and your criteria, pre-screening every angry visitor.

See case studies →

{06} HOW IT STARTS

From a free intake review to a chatbot that screens for you.

  1. 00week 1

    Free intake review

    We review your site's intake, show where wronged employees drop off, and map the qualifying questions your chat should ask. Yours to keep.

  2. 00days

    Train and install

    We train it on your claim criteria, process, and tone, then it goes live with one line of code. It starts screening the same day.

  3. 00ongoing

    Review and sharpen

    Transcripts reviewed weekly, qualification tuned, gaps closed. Every month it screens a little sharper.

{07} WHY LAWWAYS

We only do law firms, and we understand employment's qualification problem.

A generic chat widget is sold by the thousand to gyms, dentists, and law firms alike, same bot, different logo, no idea what a viable claim looks like. Ours exists because we run the ads and SEO that bring employment visitors to your site, and we know most are venting and a few are gold. It asks the questions that separate them, books the real cases, and is wired into the same voice agents and automations as the rest of your intake. And you can test our work in the corner of this page right now.

  • 1focus: employment law
  • 1firm per market
  • Pre-screensstrong claims from venting

{08} FOUNDING PARTNERS

One employment firm per market. Make sure the strong claim finds yours.

We never build intake for two competing employment firms in the same market. Five founding spots remain, locked pricing, direct founder access. The wronged employee with a real case will find one firm that screens, books, and fights. We only ever build one.

3 of 5 spots remaining

{09} QUESTIONS EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS ASK

The doubts, answered honestly.

Screening, fairness to visitors, legal advice, bar rules, real bookings, the caller. The questions every employment lawyer asks before putting AI chat on their site.

It asks the qualifying questions you would, the facts, the timing, the documentation, and sorts accordingly. It does not make the legal call, it gathers and triages so your team decides on a short list of real candidates. You will see it in the transcripts.

Yes. Someone without a claim gets a courteous, helpful reply, not a cold rejection, which protects your reputation and reviews while saving your attorneys the hour.

No. It is built to screen and book, explains rights only in general terms, gives no legal advice, makes no outcome promises, and captures consent. Scripts are state-aware and you approve them.

Yes, configured properly. It discloses it is an AI assistant, follows your bar's advertising rules, and you approve every script before launch.

Real bookings. It qualifies, offers your actual availability, books the slot, and triggers confirmations through your <a href="/services/ai-automations/">automations</a>. Email capture is the fallback, not the goal.

Routed to your team during hours and to <a href="/services/voice-agents/">your voice agent</a> after hours, which qualifies too. The chat catches the typers. Together they catch everyone.

Right now, a strong claim is sitting in your inbox next to a hundred venters.

The intake review is free, shows exactly where cases leak, and is yours to keep.

No contract. No spam. One firm per market.