Pre-qualifies every lead
Asks your criteria in seconds, sorts strong claims from venting, with voice and chat.
{01} EMPLOYMENT LAW AI AUTOMATIONS
Employment firms drown in inquiries, and most are angry people without a viable claim. Sorting them by hand burns the hours your attorneys should spend on real cases, and meanwhile a few strong claims wait too long for a reply and statute deadlines tick. AI automation responds in seconds, pre-qualifies every inquiry against your criteria, and tracks the deadlines, so your team talks only to cases worth taking.
Free intake-flow audit. See where your time leaks. Yours to keep.
Find where your time is leaking
We map how an employment inquiry moves through your firm, and show you how much attorney time goes to unqualified leads, and where strong cases slip away.
{02} WHERE EMPLOYMENT TIME AND CASES LEAK
Attorneys qualifying venters by hand. An employment firm fields a flood of inquiries, and most are upset people without a viable claim. When your attorneys or paralegals sort them by hand, hours that should go to real cases go to consultations that end in we cannot help you. The qualifying itself is the leak.
The strong case that waited too long. Among the venting are the rare, valuable cases, and they will not wait. If a strong claim sits hours or days for a reply, the angry-but-righteous client calls the next firm while the resolve is hot. Slow intake loses exactly the cases you most want.
The deadline nobody was tracking. Employment claims have statutes of limitation and agency filing windows. When intake is manual and chaotic, a deadline can pass on a viable case before anyone calendars it, which is both a lost case and a real risk.
{03} IMAGINE INSTEAD
Picture Monday morning. Over the weekend, dozens of inquiries came in. Each got an instant, intelligent reply that asked your qualifying questions, what happened, when, is there documentation, and sorted them: the strong wrongful termination claim is flagged and booked, the wage case is gathering its pay records automatically, and the ones with no viable claim were handled courteously without taking an attorney's hour. Every deadline is calendared. Your team opens the week to a short list of real cases, not a mountain to sort. Nobody did it by hand.
{04} WHAT WE BUILD
Every inquiry gets an intelligent reply in seconds that asks your qualifying questions, so the strong claims are identified before an attorney spends a minute.
It applies your real criteria, the facts, the timeline, the documentation, to separate viable wrongful termination, harassment, discrimination, retaliation, and wage cases from the venting.
Statutes of limitation and agency filing windows calendared automatically, so a viable case never dies on a missed date.
Automated requests for the emails, pay records, and timelines that employment cases live on, gathered without your team chasing them.
Every conversation, claim detail, and deadline lands in your CRM, complete and structured. No re-typing, ever.
One dashboard, every lead, its qualification status, and upcoming deadlines, tied to the ads and SEO that produced it.
{05} — WATCH IT RUN
{06} HOW IT STARTS
We map how inquiries move through your firm today and show you how much attorney time goes to unqualified leads, plus where strong cases leak, with numbers. Yours to keep.
Pre-qualification, claim-criteria sorting, deadline tracking, and document collection, wired into your phone, website, and CRM. No rip and replace.
We watch the data, tune the qualification, and add automations as you grow.
{07} WHY LAWWAYS
Generic automation consultants wire up tools and leave, with no idea that employment's core challenge is sorting strong claims from venting. We run the ads and SEO that bring you employment leads, so we know most are not cases, that the strong ones will not wait, and that deadlines are real risk. Our automations pre-qualify, calendar, and connect the voice agent and chatbot that answer first contact. Same team, accountable from click to qualified case.
{08} FOUNDING PARTNERS
We never build intake for two competing employment firms in the same market. Five founding spots remain, locked pricing, direct founder access. Marketing without qualification buries you in venting. Automation without marketing has nothing to sort. Founding firms get both.
3 of 5 spots remaining
{09} QUESTIONS EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS ASK
Screening, fairness, deadlines, compliance, your CRM, the rest of intake. The questions every employment lawyer asks before automating intake.
It applies your criteria, the facts, timing, and documentation you would ask about, to sort and flag inquiries before an attorney spends time. It is not making legal judgments, it is gathering and triaging so your team makes the call on a short list of real candidates.
Yes. Those without a viable claim get a courteous, helpful response, not a cold rejection, which protects your reputation and reviews, while not burning an attorney hour on a consultation that goes nowhere.
Yes, and it is one of the highest-value things it does. Statutes and agency windows are calendared automatically, so a viable case never dies on a missed date.
Sequences follow advertising and solicitation rules, identification, no legal advice from automation, no contacting represented parties, consent-based texting. You approve every sequence.
Almost certainly. We build on Clio, Lawmatics, MyCase, standard phone systems. The audit confirms compatibility first.
They handle first contact, <a href="/services/voice-agents/">voice</a> for callers, <a href="/services/ai-chatbots/">chat</a> for visitors, and qualify as they go, while automation handles sorting and follow-up. Start with the leak the audit finds first.
The intake-flow audit is free, shows where your time and cases leak, and is yours to keep.